ELIA KACHWERE
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal after finding the guilty plea was improperly taken because the trial court did not explain each ingredient of the offence.
- Rape
- Plea procedure
- Conviction
- Sentence
- Trial de novo
- Criminal-appeal
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal after finding the guilty plea was improperly taken because the trial court did not explain each ingredient of the offence.
The District Land and Housing Tribunal acted without jurisdiction by ordering and conducting a trial de novo itself instead of remitting the matter to the Ward Tribunal, rendering all subsequent proceedings and decisions a nullity. Failure to join Salum Mapuya was not fatal as he had no interest in the suit land.
Source excerpt
The proceedings and award of the CMA were vitiated by irregularities in the admission of exhibits, which breached the right to a fair hearing and the principles of natural justice. As a result, the proceedings are nullified and a trial de novo is ordered before a different arbitrator.
Source excerpt
The High Court partly allowed this civil appeal, set aside a retrial order, upheld the trial court judgment, and awarded costs to the respondent.
The High Court upheld the Tribunal’s second-appeal decision and held that the parties must comply with prior tribunal and Court of Appeal directives in their land dispute.
The High Court set aside a CMA award after finding witness evidence had been recorded without oath, a mandatory defect that vitiated the proceedings.
The Court of Appeal held that irregular and unclear involvement of assessors in the District Land and Housing Tribunal rendered the proceedings a nullity.
The High Court of Tanzania Labour Division nullified CMA proceedings and set aside an award after finding the record could not be traced or reconstructed.
The High Court nullified CMA proceedings for material recording discrepancies and inconsistencies, quashed the award, and ordered a de novo hearing before another arbitrator.
The failure of the Tribunal Chairman to solicit, receive, read out, and consider the assessors' opinions in the proceedings and judgment is a fatal omission that vitiates the entire proceedings, necessitating their nullification and a retrial.
Source excerpt
Explore more