Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a remission refusal, finding the Director General reasonably concluded the applicant had not shown extenuating circumstances or procedural unfairness.
The assessment officer applied Column III of Tariff B as ordered by the Court and, on the basis of the Court file, parties' submissions and applicable jurisprudence, allowed 14 units under Items 19, 20, 22(a), 25 and 26 (total $2,520), disallowed 2 units under Item 27, reduced disbursements to $495.89 (allowing $7.64 courier and $488.25 photocopies), and assessed the respondent's bill of costs at $3,015.89 payable by the appellant.
Source excerpt
Federal Court dismissed IMAX’s judicial review of CRA’s refusal to extend CEWS filing deadlines, finding the interpretation and application of s. 125.7(16) reasonable.
The Federal Court assessed the Defendants’ Bill of Costs at $24,788.24, allowed costs slightly above the Tariff B midpoint, and declined to decide judgment interest.
The assessment officer has jurisdiction to assess and certify the respondent's Bill of Costs once the Court awarded costs; the Appellant's challenge to the Court's jurisdiction does not negate the enforceability of the Judgment. Applying Rule 407 and Tariff B, the officer allowed 16.5 units ($2,805) for assessable services and disbursements of $288.56 (disallowing a $25.33 courier fee), for a total assessed amount of $3,093.56 payable by the Appellant to the Respondent.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court dismissed a Rule 51 motion to appeal an Associate Judge’s order striking a claim without leave to amend and awarded the Defendant $500 in costs.
Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a study permit refusal, finding the officer’s core concern about the proposed program’s purpose justified the decision despite errors on family ties and finances.
The Federal Court found the CRA’s CERB denial unreasonable because it rejected amended tax documents without explaining the inconsistency in its reasoning.
The Federal Court granted a Rule 167 motion to dismiss for delay, finding nearly four years of stalled discovery, incomplete undertakings, prejudice, and no effective alternative.
The Federal Court dismissed a Privacy Act application as moot and premature after the RCMP belatedly disclosed records, holding that adequacy of disclosure required a fresh complaint.
Explore more
