Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court granted a further detention order for seized firearms-related items until June 30, 2025, finding the investigation complex and the balance of justice in favour of detention.
Because the Crown did not disprove an element of the s.35 defence beyond a reasonable doubt, and on the evidence the accused was in peaceable possession, reasonably believed the complainant was about to steal his property, acted to prevent the taking, and used only a minimal, reasonable tap, the defence of property applied and the Crown failed to prove assault beyond a reasonable doubt; accused acquitted.
Source excerpt
Application to sell the Richmond family property was dismissed. The court varied interim spousal support on a without-prejudice basis and made several procedural orders.
The court held the respondent was estopped from relying on s. 1(1) of the Family Relations Act and ordered interim spousal support and housing-cost sharing.
The court granted interim spousal support to Elaine Steele, finding enough evidence to treat the relationship as ongoing for limitation purposes and to support estoppel.
On supplemental reasons, the court held that a safety officer had reasonable and lawful grounds to seek entry to the petitioners’ residence under the Safety Standards Act.
The Court of Appeal dismissed as moot an appeal about whether s. 49(10) of the Community Charter permits conditional destruction orders for dangerous dogs.
A British Columbia court expanded an injunction in a rail labour dispute to cover all Schedule A facilities, but declined to restrain train trackage for lack of necessity.
Leave to appeal was dismissed in an injunction dispute arising from a protest and alleged blockade at a lumber mill, because there was sufficient evidence of obstruction.
La Cour suprême de la Colombie-Britannique rejette l’appel d’un ordonnance ministérielle autorisant une inspection visuelle supplémentaire de la résidence du demandeur par un ingénieur des défendeurs.
Explore more
