Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a refusal under the Agri-Food Pilot, finding the officer failed to engage with key evidence about the employer’s NAICS 1114 eligibility.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an IRCC refusal under the Home Child Care Provider Class, finding the officer reasonably concluded the job offer was not genuine.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an RPD cessation decision, finding the applicants voluntarily returned to TĂĽrkiye and reavailed themselves of its protection.
The Federal Court struck CILA’s judicial review application, holding it did not disclose a reviewable matter under s. 18.1 and that public interest standing was unavailable.
Federal Court granted judicial review of a refugee/permanent residence refusal, finding the decision relied on uncited evidence, misapplied the refugee test, and ignored a central allegation.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an RPD credibility decision in a refugee claim based on sexual orientation, finding the panel’s concerns and treatment of corroborative evidence were reasonable.
La Cour fédérale rejette le contrôle judiciaire d’un refus de demande CH, jugeant raisonnable l’analyse sur l’identité, l’établissement, l’intérêt supérieur des enfants et la preuve médicale.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a RAD refugee decision, finding the FIR and related documents not genuine, and no procedural fairness breach.
Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an immigration refusal, holding the officer reasonably assessed credibility, truthfulness concerns, and the applicant’s response.
The ID is entitled, when applying paragraph 36(1)(b) IRPA, to consider extraneous circumstances that made the legal defence of duress not practically available in the foreign jurisdiction because duress goes to the voluntariness fundamental to criminal liability; the ID unreasonably failed to consider credible evidence that duress prevented the appellant from raising the defence and therefore the ID decision is set aside and the matter must be remitted for reconsideration.
Source excerpt
Explore more
