Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a refusal under the Agri-Food Pilot, finding the officer failed to engage with key evidence about the employer’s NAICS 1114 eligibility.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed Matthew Lucas’s appeal and upheld the Review Board’s decision to continue detention, finding the disposition reasonable and supported by evidence.
The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the Crown’s appeal: the Tax Court did not err in awarding enhanced costs (60% of Marine Atlantic’s legal fees) because the Crown’s prolonged refusal to accept BC Ferries findings and its last‑minute filing of the Shimizu affidavit constituted conduct that unnecessarily lengthened and increased the cost of the proceeding and justified compensation and deterrence; the Tax Court’s quantum was within its discretion and not unprincipled for lack of comparative citations.
Source excerpt
The Tribunal's finding that race and colour were factors in the City's decisions to suspend and terminate Mema was reasonable and supported by the evidentiary record; the chambers judge correctly dismissed the petition for judicial review and this Court will dismiss the appeal, deferring to the Tribunal's factual inferences and concluding any minor factual error was not material to the result.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an RPD credibility decision in a refugee claim based on sexual orientation, finding the panel’s concerns and treatment of corroborative evidence were reasonable.
The Appeal Division's decision was reasonable: the Court refused to consider Charter arguments raised for the first time on judicial review; the applicant failed to prove good cause under s.10(4) EI Act for the entire period of delay such that antedating to May 22, 2022 was warranted, and even allowing a limited antedate to August 2023 would not produce sufficient insurable hours to qualify; therefore the application is dismissed.
Source excerpt
The Appeal Division's dismissal of the applicant's appeal was reasonable because the General Division properly found misconduct under s.30 of the Employment Insurance Act: the applicant knew or ought to have known IKEA's customer conduct expectations, had been warned, and willfully contravened the policy by directing a customer to 'shut up'; the factual findings were not perverse or capricious and the applicant's health and harassment claims did not render the decision unreasonable.
Source excerpt
La Cour fédérale rejette le contrôle judiciaire d’une décision de la SPR, jugeant raisonnable la conclusion qu’une PRI viable existait à Barranquilla.
La Cour fédérale rejette le contrôle judiciaire d’une décision de la SAR confirmant le refus d’asile, jugeant raisonnables les conclusions défavorables à la crédibilité du demandeur.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed Tehama Group Inc.’s appeal from the dismissal of its application to set aside an arbitral award under the UNCITRAL Model Law.
Explore more
