Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an IRCC refusal under the Home Child Care Provider Class, finding the officer reasonably concluded the job offer was not genuine.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a RAD refugee decision, finding the FIR and related documents not genuine, and no procedural fairness breach.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of a CBSA officer’s refusal to defer removal to Ghana, finding the decision reasonable on risk, mental health, and spousal sponsorship grounds.
The Federal Court granted judicial review, finding the RAD unreasonably refused the applicant’s sister’s affidavit as new evidence and remitted the matter for redetermination.
The Federal Court dismissed judicial review, finding the RAD reasonably upheld an internal flight alternative in MĂ©rida and reasonably assessed credibility issues.
The Federal Court allowed judicial review of a refugee refusal, finding the RPD unreasonably preferred generalized country evidence over a specific threat and remitted the matter.
La Cour fédérale rejette le contrôle judiciaire d’une décision de la SAR, jugeant raisonnables les conclusions sur la crédibilité et la PRI à Barranquilla.
The Federal Court dismissed a PRRA judicial review, finding the officer reasonably assessed corroboration, state protection, and procedural fairness in Albania.
The Court dismissed the judicial review application because the Board’s decision was reasonable: the record demonstrated the union had attempted representation, explained its strategy, obtained legal advice, and legitimately withdrew the grievance due to the applicant’s repeated non-cooperation; there was no evidence of bad faith or arbitrariness and the Board permissibly decided without an oral hearing under the Code.
Source excerpt
Contrôle judiciaire rejeté : la Cour conclut que l’analyse de la SAR sur la crédibilité, les relevés bancaires, les omissions et les notes médicales était raisonnable.
Explore more
