Polowy v Kelly
The Court of Appeal concluded the motion judge misapprehended the record and erred in law in applying promissory estoppel (failed to require intent to affect legal relations and misapplied facts); set aside the motion judge’s promissory estoppel finding; directed that whether the FPA limitation bars the petitioner’s claim (including related questions of agreement and statutory extension) be determined at trial; held the appeal is not moot because the reference proceeded subject to the outcome of this appeal.
Source excerpt
- Promissory estoppel
- Limitation period
- Summary judgment
- Equalization of family property
- Pension division
- Mootness