18 Jul 2025
CCC v. AAC
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 2987
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT131/2024
The court found on the evidence that the initial 16 October 2024 SMS notice from HKAS was received by the respondent and his denial was not convincing; the respondent failed to rebut the presumption of proper notice and did not demonstrate he was unable to present his case; allegations of fraud were unproved and did not engage public policy; accordingly the challenge under s.86 failed and the enforcement order stands, with costs adjusted to party-to-party due to a serious but unintended omission by the applicant in failing to provide supplemental agreements to the respondent.