28 Apr 1987
The impugned condition was beyond the trial judge's jurisdiction because it improperly fettered the discretion of future judges; activation of suspended sentences is governed by section 109C and the condition was not a permitted statutory condition, therefore the condition must be deleted.
10 May 1978
The activation of the three‑month suspended sentence was unlawful because the underlying offence carried a maximum penalty of a fine only under Cap.166 s.31(2); therefore the activation order was set aside and the appellant's effective term reduced by three months.
15 Nov 1976
The suspended custodial sentence of six months was excessive in the circumstances; having regard to the appellant's genuine but erroneous belief in title, the repetitive nature of the offence and the need to secure the land for imminent public use, a reduced immediate custodial sentence of three months (to run from the activation date) adequately punished the appellant and protected the land's intended use.