16 May 2014
CWG v. MH AND OTHERS
- Citation
- CWG v. MH AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP643/2012
The court found that R2 had not complied in full with the Discovery Order as to items 6, 8, 9 and 12 because the affidavits were illusory or showed no evidence of a conscientious effort to obtain and produce documents within R2's power (security agreements, sale documentation for cars and timepieces, and relevant company accounts); therefore the non-compliance stood and costs would follow.