26 Jan 2021
C v. D1 AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 228
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT3/2021
The injunction was not continued because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate any proprietary interest in the Subject Entities sufficient to support a proprietary injunction and there was no proper basis to proceed or continue ex parte; at best the plaintiff holds a contractual right to compel completion of the agreed restructuring and allotment procedure, not a present proprietary shareholding across the listed entities, and the broad freezing order and disclosure could not be justified.