12 Sept 2019
鄭 對 陳
- Citation
- [2019] HKFC 232
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC3515/2014
The court accepted the jointly‑instructed Chinese lawyer's factual and legal investigation showing no evidence of registered ownership by the husband and that the local authorities/village committee could not confirm title; the applicant failed to prove the husband owned the Huizhou property or that any matrimonial asset existed. Therefore there were no assets to divide and the ancillary relief claim failed.