27 Feb 2018
LHC v. KHS
- Citation
- [2018] HKFC 23
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC3343/2015
Petitioner had partial success because respondent made additional relevant disclosures after the summons; however significant parts of the summons (notably paras 2 and 3) were oppressive, imprecise or unjustified while the second questionnaire's questions were largely reasonable; balancing these factors and exercising discretion under Order 62 the correct costs order was that petitioner pay half the costs of the summons and there be no order as to costs for the other half, with standard certification and taxation provisions; same order for costs of the arguments as an order nisi.