27 May 2020
香港特別行政區 訴 朱耀强
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 318
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA322/2019
The magistrate accepteda victim's evidence that he lost a watch and identified the pawned watch by serial number; the pawnbroker's identification evidence matched the appellant's identity; the appellant gave no explanation; the only reasonable inference was that the appellant knew or suspected the watch was stolen, so the prosecution proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt and conviction was upheld.