17 Feb 2009
W. HING CONSTRUCTION CO LTD v. BOOST INVESTMENTS LTD
- Citation
- W. HING CONSTRUCTION CO LTD v. BOOST INVESTMENTS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT1/2006
Court held that (1) plaintiff had given sufficient notice under GCC 23 for Event 1 only (24 days) but not for Event 2; (2) alleged estoppel/waiver by defendant was not established because representations were not clear or shown to have been made by someone with authority; (3) the court has power to re‑open and reassess an Architect's EOT decision but does not have power to issue the GCC22 certificate (CNC) required to levy LADs where the Architect has not done so; (4) GCC22(1) requires an independent opinion by the Architect that the works ought reasonably to have been completed by the (exten…