12 Sept 2008
ANTHONY JAMES HATTON v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
- Citation
- ANTHONY JAMES HATTON v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP844/2007
The application to discharge the Anton Piller Order was dismissed because the defendants failed to demonstrate that subsequent discovery in the main action had extinguished the plaintiffs' entitlement to inspect electronic records under the Anton Piller Order and failed to file evidence in opposition to continuation; accordingly the Anton Piller Order remains in effect and the defendants were ordered to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the application.