30 Dec 2003
CHO KAM FOOK v. MAK SHUI HA JANET
- Citation
- CHO KAM FOOK v. MAK SHUI HA JANET
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1410/2000
The plaintiff failed to rebut the presumption that the registered proprietor was the beneficial owner because contemporaneous bank statements and documentary evidence supported the defendant's account that a third party funded the purchase and mortgage; consequently the plaintiff had no beneficial interest. The defendant failed to prove entitlement to reimbursement for replacement deeds or to damages for the alleged removed items because she did not demand return and produced no adequate evidence of ownership or value.