29 Sept 2025
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify a question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484, raised no reasonably arguable error in the Court of Appeal's judgment, and showed no basis under the 'otherwise' limb.
18 Jul 2025
The Notice of Motion for leave to appeal was dismissed because the 1st Applicant did not identify a question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484, raised no reasonably arguable error in the Court of Appeal's judgment, and showed no basis under the "otherwise" limb to justify leave.
16 Mar 2023
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under section 22(1)(b) HKCFAO and there was no basis to grant leave under the 'or otherwise' limb; therefore the notice of motion was dismissed.
14 Mar 2023
The notice of motion for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under section 22(1)(b) HKCFAO and there was no basis under the 'or otherwise' limb to grant leave.
25 May 2022
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s 22(1)(b) Cap 484 and no basis was shown under the 'otherwise' limb, so the Court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application for leave.
25 Apr 2022
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance, raised no reasonably arguable error in the CA Judgment, and provided no basis under the 'or otherwise' limb of section 22(1)(b) HKCFAO.
24 Dec 2021
The Notice of Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was dismissed because the intended appeal lacked merit and did not identify any question of great general or public importance under s.22(1)(b) HKCFAO, nor any basis under the "or otherwise" limb.
23 Dec 2021
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484, raised no arguable error in the court's judgment, and provided no basis under the "otherwise" limb to justify leave.
17 Nov 2021
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant did not identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, nor any error in the Court of Appeal's judgment that was reasonably arguable, and no basis was shown under the 'otherwise' limb, so leave was refused.
27 Oct 2020
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) and failed to demonstrate any arguable error in the Judge's or this Court's decisions; consequently the statutory requirements for leave were not met and the notice of motion was dismissed.