12 Feb 1997
The application for extension of time was dismissed because the applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the gross delay and did not demonstrate a strong prima facie case; cross-examination on prior convictions was properly allowed given the applicant's allegation that the drugs were planted.
29 Dec 1987
The trial judge did not err: admitting the applicant's previous convictions for cross-examination was a lawful exercise of discretion given the allegation of police fabrication; the quantity of drugs found gave rise to the presumption of possession for trafficking which the applicant failed to rebut; on the evidence the conviction was properly reached and the sentence was within the Chan Chi Ming guideline given the applicant's record.
9 Jun 1981
Leave to appeal refused because the voir dire was properly conducted and it was proper for the judge to question the accused about prior convictions when admissibility and credibility were at issue; the cautioned statement was admissible and the jury were properly directed; the evidence supported the conviction.