30 Jan 2015
香港特別行政區 訴 葉繼歡
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 葉繼歡
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA260/2010
The trial judge acted within proper discretion in accepting PW1's direct evidence as credible and in finding corroboration in the CCTV footage and medical/eyewitness signs of injury; the inconsistencies in peripheral matters (pen handling, photos) did not undermine the core evidence and there was no basis for appellate interference with conviction or with the six‑month sentence.