18 Mar 2025
CHINA EVERGRANDE GROUP (IN LIQUIDATION) v. HUI KA YAN AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 897
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1080/2024
The Confidentiality Summons was dismissed because the applicant failed to meet the high necessity threshold to restrict open justice; the Clarification Summons was dismissed in respect of the contested negative and anticipatory declarations (Paragraphs 2–4) because they were premature, not practically useful, overlapped with English proceedings or already addressed by the English court, but the consent amendment in Paragraph 1 was approved; costs were ordered against Ms Ding for both summonses and the Paragraph 1 amendment.