20 Sept 2006
PANG HONG v. PRO-CENTRIC GROUP LTD
- Citation
- PANG HONG v. PRO-CENTRIC GROUP LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA85/2005
The appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted for retrial because the Presiding Officer erred in law and fact by failing to determine whether the Employment Contract or prior PCLH terms governed the claimant's duties after transfer, by not investigating whether the claimant's outside directorships, failure to account for emoluments, negotiation/signing of the Extension Agreement and refusal to remit US$900,000 amounted to breaches justifying summary dismissal, and thus could not properly conclude summary dismissal was unjustified without a full inquiry.