24 Mar 2016
盧平 對 關智遠，髮剪局之合夥人及另二人
- Citation
- 盧平 對 關智遠，髮剪局之合夥人及另二人
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA43/2015
The Tribunal's finding that the claimant was an employee was supported by evidence of the true substance of the relationship—use of employer's tools and materials, regular hours and time records, lack of investment or financial risk, absence of power to hire, and obligation to notify for absences—so the written label of 'self‑employed' was not determinative; there was no legal error warranting appellate intervention and the leave application was dismissed.