16 Dec 2019
香港陸號服務有限公司 對 MOK YIN YIN
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 2981
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCSA39/2019
The application for leave was refused because the Tribunal's factual findings—credibility of the claimant's witness, acceptance that materials costing HK$31,500 and inspection work of HK$1,800 were incurred, and that the defendant intended to sign—are dispositive facts not open to being overturned on this leave application under the Ordinance; there is no arguable question of law or jurisdiction sufficient to grant leave and the result would be unchanged even if clause 15 were characterized as a penalty.