20 Oct 2020
教育路福照樓業主立案法團 對 谷翠香
- Citation
- [2020] HKLdT 41
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDBM14/2019
The applicant proved on the balance of probabilities that valid owners' resolutions and deed provisions obliged the respondent, as owner of one thirty‑fourth share, to pay the apportioned maintenance charges and related fees; the s22(4) certificate and corroborating documents constituted sufficient prima facie evidence; the respondent's allegations were irrelevant or unsupported and did not negate liability, therefore judgment is entered for the applicant for the sums claimed together with interest and costs.