20 Aug 1996
R. v. YU KIM HUNG and Anothers
- Citation
- R. v. YU KIM HUNG and Anothers
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA764/1996
The magistrate lawfully preferred the prosecution witness and his factual findings were not vitiated by legal error; the psychiatrist's opinion was of scant value because it rested on false or incomplete facts; therefore the convictions were properly upheld and the appeal dismissed.