26 Mar 1997
R. v. YU TIN CHI, Candy and Another
- Citation
- R. v. YU TIN CHI, Candy and Another
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA1359/1996
The magistrate erred by allowing confusion over the Television Ordinance and thereby depriving both appellants of a fair opportunity to present available defences under s.27A; accordingly the conviction of the first appellant is set aside and the second appellant is entitled to a retrial.