18 Jul 2007
PACIFIC CHINA HOLDINGS LTD v. GRAND PACIFIC HOLDINGS LTD
- Citation
- PACIFIC CHINA HOLDINGS LTD v. GRAND PACIFIC HOLDINGS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT5/2007
Applying the Porter v Magill test to the factual context, the communications were non-substantive and limited to candidate selection, both arbitrators engaged similarly and ceased when requested, and the ICC had rejected an identical challenge; on that basis an informed bystander would not perceive a real possibility of bias, so removal was not justified and the application failed.