8 Jun 2012
香港特別行政區 訴 黃永欣及另二人
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 黃永欣及另二人
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA879/2011
First appellant's conviction and 14‑month sentence were upheld because the trial judge's findings on the evidence were lawful and the sentencing calculus (15‑month baseline reduced for mitigation) was appropriate; second and third appellants' acquittals were correct because prosecution failed to prove the knowledge element and the trial judge erred in denying costs based on suspicious conduct alone, therefore they are entitled to trial and appeal costs.