22 May 2012
香港特別行政區 訴 廖俊銘
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 廖俊銘
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA728/2011
The High Court found on the evidence that the appellant had been cautioned, understood his rights, there was no evidence he was induced or misled into answering as a mere witness, and any mischaracterisation of which rule applied or omission as to instruction 8 did not render admission of the statements unfair; therefore the statements were admissible and the conviction was safe.