23 Feb 2021
香港特別行政區 訴 鄭嘉雄
- Citation
- [2021] HKCA 192
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC124/2020
Leave to appeal was granted because the trial judge's adverse inference that the applicant possessed and intended to use the altered credit card was open to real doubt: the existence of another person with a key and residence at the premises (per PW3 DPC 9467) and the trial judge's failure to correctly state or consider that evidence meant the irresistible inference of exclusive possession and intent was not established, rendering the conviction potentially unsafe.