3 Sept 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 崔炳華
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 3268
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA409/2023
On a re‑hearing of the factual evidence the court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that PW1 reliably identified the appellant from the fruit stall and CCTV monitoring, that the pork taken came from the supermarket and its chain of custody was intact, that the appellant produced the unpaid pork and made admissions, and that the judge’s questioning did not render the trial unfair; accordingly the conviction is upheld.