8 Sept 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 李彥進
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 2729
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA111/2022
The magistrate correctly found on the balance of probabilities that the appellant did not prove non-receipt was not due to his negligence because his admitted practice of checking the mailbox only once every one to two weeks amounted to negligence; there was no evidence of postal misdelivery; therefore s16A(1) relief to cancel the s16(2) order was not available and the appeal is dismissed.