27 May 2011
涂志強 v. 合生公司 (商號) AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- 涂志強 v. 合生公司 (商號) AND ANOTHER
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEC40/2010
The Board was joined only as an intervener to protect the Fund and not as if it were the employer; because the 1st Respondent had not been served no judgment could be entered against it; on the facts the Applicant failed to prove employment or causation on the balance of probabilities and the court declined to exercise the s.2(2) discretion in his favour; consequently the action was dismissed.