ĺł ĺ° ç
Court found separation date was July 2009; Cheung Sha Wan property was acquired after separation with respondent's post-separation funds and is nonâmatrimonial (or justifies departure from equal sharing); applicant failed to make full, credible disclosure so adverse inferences applied; applicant's future need assessed at HK$3,240,000 minus disclosed assets (HK$98,723.11) but allowing an adverse inference reduced recovery to a fair lump sum of HK$2,513,000; ordered applicant to vacate Cheung Sha Wan property within 4 months and respondent to pay HK$2,513,000 in staged payments with respondentâŚ
Source excerpt
- Separation date
- Asset characterisation
- Non-disclosure and adverse inference
- Needs assessment
- Departure from equal sharing
- Occupancy orders