9 Mar 2011
HAU TUNG YING AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR
- Citation
- HAU TUNG YING AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FACC2/2010
The conspiracy convictions were quashed because the judge widened the prosecution case to include the thefts without giving defendants the opportunity to address this new basis, producing a material irregularity and unfair trial; however, because the judge's findings on the theft charges were supported by properly admitted evidence and were essential to his reasoning, the Court exercised its discretion under s.83A CPO to substitute convictions on the four theft charges and to sentence each appellant to four years' imprisonment on each theft count to run concurrently with credit for time alrea…