5 Oct 2009
SUN FOCUS INVESTMENT LTD v. TANG SHING BOR AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- SUN FOCUS INVESTMENT LTD v. TANG SHING BOR AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA538/2007
The Amended Statement of Claim was struck out in its entirety because it failed to fairly and coherently state the plaintiff's case: it contained legal labels inconsistent with the pleaded facts, significant immaterial and evidential averments, and a fatal mismatch between the pleaded misrepresentation and the particulars of loss which could not be cured by blue-pencilling; however the action was not immediately dismissed and the plaintiff was given 14 days to seek leave to file a fresh Statement of Claim.