22 May 2013
LAM HON WING v. CENTALINE PROPERTY AGENCY LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- LAM HON WING v. CENTALINE PROPERTY AGENCY LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ5441/2008
Plaintiff failed to prove that the agents made actionable misrepresentations or that he relied on any such statements; the agency and preliminary agreements were valid and (though Regulation No 6 was breached) the breach did not bar recovery under section 45; the plaintiff breached the preliminary agreement by failing to complete (cheque dishonoured) and is liable to pay the contractual liquidated sum of HK$53,000 with interest.