19 Nov 2021
TANG WANG KEI KEITH v. TANG CHUN WAH AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2021] HKDC 1448
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ1673/2017
The court found on the evidence that the manager (TTY) had been missing since October 2014 and therefore D1 and D2 satisfied Order 15 r13(1)(b) and (2)(b); the court appointed D1 and D2 to represent the 6th defendant to defend the action, rejected the plaintiff's attempt to obtain default judgment as service was defective and entered against the plaintiff costs orders and taxation directions; the late affirmation of Madam Lau was admitted de bene esse but its evidence was rejected for lack of credibility and objective support.