5 Jul 2013
SINGH, HARJIT v. VSL HONG KONG LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- SINGH, HARJIT v. VSL HONG KONG LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCPI153/2012
The Master allowed the late amendments because the proposed changes were arguable and relevant to a just resolution, the evidence was not new to defendants and caused no real prejudice, the delay was limited and did not disrupt the assessment, and the substantive issues (exclusion of months, notional earnings, multiplier, PSLA) were matters properly left for determination at the assessment hearing; however costs consequences flow to the applicant for making a late application.