Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Hong Kong Case Law

Non-molestation
  • 28 Feb 2008

    HRT v. RHT

    Citation
    HRT v. RHT
    Court
    Family Court
    Case number
    FCMC5488/2006

    The court found the wife was effectively unable to return to Indonesia and had no reasonable means to fund adequate litigation or living costs; the husband has the ability to pay and the Currey criteria for interim costs assistance were satisfied; accordingly the husband was ordered to pay increased maintenance (with specified allocations and backdating) and a monthly contribution to litigation costs, with specified effective dates.

  • 22 Jun 2000

    S v. S

    Citation
    S v. S
    Court
    Court of First Instance
    Case number
    HCMP5547/1999

    Applying the established family-law principle that ordinarily there should be no order for costs in child-related proceedings unless exceptional circumstances exist, the court found the mother’s conduct was not reprehensible nor was her litigation conduct unreasonable; an adverse order would disproportionately harm her. Consequently the court exercised its discretion to make no order for costs (including those reserved), while awarding the costs of the present costs contest to the respondent to be taxed if not agreed, nisi 14 days.