21 Feb 2000
ROE INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. UNIONIX DEVELOPMENT LTD
- Citation
- ROE INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. UNIONIX DEVELOPMENT LTD
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FACV14/1999
The consent order of 28 May 1997, viewed objectively, resolved the outstanding disputes between the parties and operated to preclude Prince Good and Unionix from pursuing damages against Roe for delay; the technical invalidity of Roe's interpleader originating summons did not justify the Court of Appeal's orders because the irregularity was waived or cured by the parties' consent and by Order 2 r.1(1); accordingly Yam J's orders dismissing the applications to lift the stay and for costs should be restored and the Court of Appeal's judgment quashed.