22 Jul 2025
The applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance required by s22(1)(b), his submissions were broad and vague and insufficient to justify leave, and no basis was shown under the 'or otherwise' limb; accordingly the application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was dismissed.
5 Nov 2024
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the applicant failed to comply with court directions, failed to demonstrate any mistake or unfairness in the Court of Appeal's decision, the tendered one-page document was irrelevant on a de bene esse basis, and no question of great general or public importance or other exceptional ground under section 22(1)(b) was established.
16 Sept 2024
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance or any error in the Court of Appeal judgment and the intended appeal had no merits and no reasonable prospect of success under s 22(1)(b) Cap 484.
24 Nov 2023
The Court held that the respondent's applications were procedurally improper and substantively without merit: the Court of Appeal's prior order under Order 59(2A)(8) precluded any oral rehearing; the respondent failed to seek leave from the judge as required and did not demonstrate any special or urgent circumstances to justify a direct application to the Court of Appeal; identical applications filed across unrelated CAMP files were improper; accordingly all such applications were revoked and costs awarded to the petitioner.
8 Apr 2021
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484 and his asserted procedural disadvantages did not render the case reasonably arguable or justify an oral hearing; the application was appropriately determined on the papers.
1 Feb 2019
The Summons was dismissed because the Applicant failed to provide a convincing explanation for the lengthy delay in seeking leave and the intended appeal lacks arguable merit given the Appeal Board's adverse credibility findings and unsubstantiated non-refoulement grounds.
11 Jun 2018
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the intended appeal was wholly devoid of merit following a case‑ and fact‑sensitive assessment and did not raise any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b); there was no justification to depart from processing the application on the papers or to grant an oral hearing.