27 Jun 2014
POWERFUL BEST LTD v. LAM YUK KUI AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- POWERFUL BEST LTD v. LAM YUK KUI AND ANOTHER
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ4678/2013
The defendants failed to satisfy the Ladd v Marshall criteria to admit further evidence on appeal and their affidavit evidence was not capable of belief or inconsistent with contemporaneous documents (IO minutes, invoice, receipt) demonstrating IO/CLP access; they failed to show a fair or reasonable probability of a bona fide defence of adverse possession; therefore the Registrar's summary judgment is upheld and leave to defend refused.