25 May 2006
GREATWIN DEVELOPMENT LTD v. HIP HAIR CULTURE LTD
- Citation
- GREATWIN DEVELOPMENT LTD v. HIP HAIR CULTURE LTD
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ3534/2005
The appeal was dismissed because the defendant's communications only manifested an intention to exercise the option and did not constitute an unequivocal exercise; market rent had not been agreed or ascertained at the relevant time, so no binding renewal was formed and Master Chan's interlocutory order awarding partial judgment was correct.