21 May 2021
李志輝 v. 蘇麗珍
- Citation
- [2021] HKLdT 37
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDBM56/2020
The tribunal found the requested meeting was exempt under Cap 599G Schedule 1 paragraph 11(a) and the respondent's insistence on postponement was an incorrect interpretation and unreasonable; the applicant was likely to succeed on the substantive issue and was therefore entitled to costs; accordingly the respondent was ordered to pay the applicant's costs to be taxed on District Court scale if not agreed.