13 Jun 2025
SIRAJ AHMED v. RAFEEQ AHMED AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 2472
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2341/2024
The summons was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to show a serious issue to be tried in respect of proprietary claims: there is no contemporaneous or corroborative evidence of the alleged partnership or common intention constructive trust, the Bangkok/India agreements do not support proprietary claims to the Hong Kong properties, damages are an adequate remedy and defendants have given undertakings, and there is no reliable evidence the gemstones exist or remain in defendants' possession to justify a preservation order.