25 Oct 2019
HKSAR v. WONG CHO SHING AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2019] HKCA 1204
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC38/2017
The Court declined to certify the four proposed questions as questions of law of great and general importance, holding that existing authority (R v Murphy; HKSAR v Lee Chi Fai; HKSAR v Yeung Ka Ho) correctly states that authenticity may be proved circumstantially and that in this case the trial judge's painstaking factual findings proved authenticity beyond reasonable doubt; complaints about non‑production of originals involved tactical choices by trial counsel and did not raise novel points of law.