5 Mar 2025
Appeal dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error of law by the Judge; the delay in seeking leave was inordinate and unjustified; the intended challenge lacked reasonably arguable grounds and permitting it after lengthy delay would prejudice immigration administration, so refusal of leave and of extension of time was proper.
13 Apr 2023
Both applications were dismissed/refused because the challenges were either overtaken by events or plainly out of time with no adequate explanation for delay; the Form 86/affirmation failed to identify reasonably arguable public law grounds; reconsideration does not cure the time bar; and the applicant failed to prosecute after obtaining interim relief, warranting refusal of leave and an award of costs to the Director.
23 Jul 2020
The application for leave was dismissed because the applicant failed to comply with the mandatory requirement to state relief and grounds in Form 86; alternatively, the Director's decisions were not irrational in the Wednesbury sense given discrepancies and evidential weight, and the application was not made promptly so there was no reason to extend time.