25 Feb 2026
香港鐵路有限公司 訴 吳兆有
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 1177
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA133/2025
經重審全部證據後,法庭確信控方已在毫無合理疑點下證明三項附例罪行,裁判官的事實評價並無不當,且合計罰款HK$4,000在本案情況下並不屬明顯過重,因此駁回上訴,維持定罪及判處。
25 Feb 2026
經重審全部證據後,法庭確信控方已在毫無合理疑點下證明三項附例罪行,裁判官的事實評價並無不當,且合計罰款HK$4,000在本案情況下並不屬明顯過重,因此駁回上訴,維持定罪及判處。
26 Sept 2025
The High Court, on re‑hearing, accepted the magistrate’s evaluation of witness credibility and concluded the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant smoked in a prohibited area and refused to provide particulars; there was no basis to overturn the magistrate’s findings given his advantage in assessing witnesses and the absence of compelling contradictory evidence.